|
By William E. McNally and Barbara E. Cotton
There has been much judicial
activity in the area of class action proceedings
of late. One aspect of class action proceedings
of interest is subclass designation - in what
circumstances will the courts be amenable to
designating subclasses within the broader
defined class? The jurisprudence remains in a
state of infancy on this point but it is the
thesis of this article that common themes have
emerged.
This article will postulate that there are four
common themes indicative of when the courts will
designate subclasses suggested by Canadian
jurisprudence and secondary materials: (1) when
there is a conflict of interest between
the broad class and the proposed subclass(es);
(2) when there are "common issues" in the
proposed subclass(es); (3) as a subset of the
"common issues" theme, when the proposed
subclass has a unique theory of liability
to advance or if there is a unique defence
relative to the proposed subclass; and (4) on
the basis of regional segregation,
frequently because the laws of the provinces or
outside of Canada are different, and in
particular if limitation periods vary.
View Full Article:.
 |
 |
The full article
is viewable with Adobe Acrobat Reader. If you do not have Acrobat Reader, it is free to download.
Click here.
|
|