|
By William E. McNally and Bottom Line Research
and Communications
In 1980, the Supreme Court of
Canada rendered two landmark decisions
pertaining to the related matters of the duty of
a physician to make disclosure to the patient
and the requirement of informed consent of the
patient to a surgical procedure.
In Hopp v. Lepp Chief Justice Laskin
considered whether a patient who suffered
permanent damages after the performance of a
hemilaminectomy had given informed consent to
the procedure. After suggesting that the patient
had a right to decide what, if anything, should
be done with his body, Laskin C.J. went on to
hold that there was a duty of disclosure – that
is, the surgeon or physician was bound by a duty
to provide information to his or her patient.
View Full Article...
 |
 |
The full articles are viewable with Adobe Acrobat Reader. If you do not have Acrobat Reader, it is free to download. Click here.
|
|